We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better.
If you choose to customise the site it will help you to find the most relevant content for your needs. You will still be able to access all content on the site.
Don't have an account?
Click here to register
My membership details
A GPST saw blood test results for an elderly patient with a significantly raised tumour marker. Later that evening, he posted the patient’s blood test result on a closed forum for doctors and asked for advice on breaking bad news.
Another GP in the group, whose father had just been told that he required an urgent biopsy, realised that the GPST had been describing her father’s case. As the test result figure was the same she was able to confirm her suspicions by looking at his user-profile.
The patient complained, after his daughter had explained what had happened, that his confidentiality had been breached in a public forum and by the tone of the discussion that took place.
The GPST responded to say that he was sincerely sorry for his thoughtless post and the distress he had caused. He reflected carefully on what had happened, explaining that he now realised that even anonymised information could identify a patient.
The GPST advised, in future he would be even more cautious about positing anything on professional internet forums. The practice also held a significant event meeting and considered whether the breach was reportable to the ICO.
We have detected you are in and some website content may have been personalised to be more relevant to you.
You can change your region setting here or at the top of the page.