MDU calls for more support for doctors investigated following a patient's unexpected death

The Medical Defence Union (MDU) says doctors being investigated following a patient's unexpected death need support and understanding from their trust or primary care organisation.

Responding to the GMC commissioned Dame Clare Marx's review of gross negligence manslaughter and culpable homicide, the MDU said there needs to be more consistency and fairness in the way trusts respond to unexpected deaths and the investigations that follow. This in turn could prevent unnecessary referrals of doctors to the police and investigations for gross negligence manslaughter.

Read the full submission.

Dr Oliver Lord, MDU medico-legal adviser said:

'It is right that organisations should focus on those left behind after a close relative or friend has died. But trusts also need to recognise and deal supportively with staff involved as they are often extremely distressed and fearful when a patient's death is unexpected.

'In the MDU's experience, some trusts and primary care organisations are supportive of doctors involved in unexpected deaths, either because there is a clear trust policy or because the doctors are fortunate to have a clinical director or colleagues who understand and are supportive. We see investigations that are undertaken with the sole aim of identifying what went wrong, why it went wrong and how to address any learning points. Unfortunately this is not the norm and our members often report that they feel those in authority seem to close ranks and often thrust the doctor into the spotlight unaided.

'Unexpected deaths should be investigated in a fair and transparent way and the NHS should seek initially to learn lessons, rather than to apportion blame. That isn't to say that doctors shouldn't be held accountable, but there are separate procedures, such as a GMC or disciplinary investigation, where such decisions can and should be made.'

The MDU commented that arrangements for reporting and investigating serious incidents could be improved if each organisation had to publicise and stick to its process. It is also important for trusts and primary care organisations to set minimum levels of resource, knowledge, skills and experience for investigation teams, the MDU suggested.

This guidance was correct at publication 27/07/2018. It is intended as general guidance for members only. If you are a member and need specific advice relating to your own circumstances, please contact one of our advisers.

You may also be interested in

News

MDU hopeful discount rate reform is around the corner

Reform is expected to the personal injury discount rate, the MDU explained

Read more
News

MDU welcomes training for GMC staff in human factors

The MDU welcomes today's announcement by the GMC that its case examiners and clinical experts are to receive human factors* training and that it will draw on human factors experts to better understand system failures when investigating doctors.

Read more
News

The MDU advises GPs to 'mind the gap' when the state-backed indemnity scheme is introduced

The Medical Defence Union (MDU) is reminding GPs that they will continue to need membership of a medical defence organisation following the introduction of state-backed indemnity in April 2019.

Read more