We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. Read more about our cookie policy
If you choose to customise the site it will help you to find the most relevant content for your needs. You will still be able to access all content on the site.
Don't have an account? Click here to register
More doctors in the UK choose the MDU for their indemnity than any other medical defence organisation.
The scheme will be introduced from 1 April 2019 for GPs in England and Wales.
Looks at the impact of conflict and handling disagreements effectively.
Led and staffed by doctors with real life experience of the pressure you face.
Over 97% of calls to our medico-legal advisers connected straight away during normal working hours.
Over the last 10 years we successfully defended over 76% of claims, making no compensation payment.
After state indemnity you’ll still need our expert guidance. MDU support can help reduce any anxiety or stress.
Access expert medico-legal guidance on the go with our app.
Are you undertaking sessions as part of the 2018 winter indemnity scheme?
Book our new 1-hour group seminars at your hospital.
You can call our medico-legal helpline 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Find out about the membership benefits for your role, and everything you need to know about joining us, from getting a quote to applying.
Your round-up of the latest medico-legal news, with a focus on patient safety, clinical negligence, new legislation and guidance impacting your practice.
Medico-legal concerns can be extremely stressful for healthcare professionals at every level, but there are lots of places you can turn to for help if you need it.
The MDU defended a GP member in a high value case concerning an alleged failure to refer to hospital for suspected endocarditis.
Dr Christine Tomkins, chief executive of the MDU and Professor Parveen Kumar CBE, president of the Royal Medical Benevolent Fund (RMBF) discuss the issues facing doctors in distress and how both organisations can help.
A GP member queried their duty of confidentiality after the FTAC contacted them about a patient who was exhibiting potentially threatening behaviour towards a public figure.