Delayed diagnosis of hernia strangulation

The scene

A patient with a known right inguinal hernia was seen at an out-of-hours GP unit by an MDU member. The patient complained of abdominal pain, but at the consultation told the GP there had been no vomiting, diarrhoea or change in bowel habit. The hernia was unchanged and the GP made a note that the patient was awaiting surgery for this, before recommending painkillers and that the hospital referral for surgery be chased up.

Three days later the patient was admitted to the surgical admissions unit, following a home visit where he complained of continuing pain in his abdomen and hernia. At the hospital it was noted that he'd had several episodes of the hernia remaining in the groin for two to three days, which had spontaneously resolved.

The patient complained of abdominal pain, but at the consultation told the GP there had been no vomiting, diarrhoea or change in bowel habit.

The patient was listed for surgery later that day, but this was delayed by a more pressing surgical emergency. The patient underwent a right inguinal hernia repair with bowel resection the next morning, which found a 2cm length of ischaemic small bowel with a very tight deep inguinal ring. Unfortunately the patient developed complications and required a further laparotomy and a small bowel resection.

The claim

The patient brought a claim against the MDU GP member, alleging she had failed to refer him to hospital which resulted in a delayed diagnosis of hernia strangulation. After the member came to us for assistance, we immediately sought independent expert advice.

Unfortunately these experts' opinions were not supportive of the member's actions, with a GP expert stating that the member was in breach of duty for failing to urgently refer the patient for a surgical assessment. A surgical expert was of the opinion that had the patient been admitted at the time of his consultation with the MDU member, the ischaemic changes in the small bowel would not have been present and he would have avoided the small bowel resection.

On the basis of the expert evidence obtained, and with the member's permission, we settled the claim in the early stages of the litigation. By doing so, we were able to resolve the matter quickly and minimise the costs incurred.

This page was correct at publication on 16/07/2018. Any guidance is intended as general guidance for members only. If you are a member and need specific advice relating to your own circumstances, please contact one of our advisers.

You may also be interested in


Avoiding diagnostic delays in myeloma

An early diagnosis of myeloma has the potential to improve the prognosis and quality of life of the patient.

Read more

How to respond to a complaint

Writing a good response is a crucial part of successfully resolving a complaint.

Read more

Fitness to practise procedures

If your fitness to practise is ever investigated by the GMC, understanding what to expect can make all the difference. Our detailed guide to the process will tell you what you need to know.

Read more